I See That Barack Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize
I See That Barack Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize
It’s interesting that if you are a Fascist these days, disguised as a liberal, you will be given the Nobel Peace Prize. I must not understand what this prize is given for. I thought it was given to someone who negotiates the stopping of a war or conflict, as Theodore Roosevelt did when Russia and Japan was engaged in bloody warfare.
So has the Nobel Peace Prize become a joke or has it become a political tool used by liberals, to try and give someone creditability, in the hopes that the world will fall into greater chaos. So with people like Al Gore a standing joke, Jimmy Carter a standing joke and now Barack Obama, I think that the Nobel Peace Prize organization has become a standing joke.
It seems that nowadays all you have to do is talk about peace and you will be given a Nobel Peace Prize, as long as you are a liberal. Has Barack Obama done anything to bring peace into the world? I haven’t seen it? Have you. There still is fighting going on, in Iraq and Afghanistan. What Barack Obama should have gotten was the Neville Chamberlin award for being so naive.
Barack Obama has now joined the ranks of Al Gore and Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002, another president that was naive. Jimmy Carter was naive when it came to the Russians, the Chinese and other world leaders. I see nothing has change when it comes to the naivety of liberalism. I don’t want to mention the naiveties of Al Gore it would take a book to cover all of them.
Was Barack Obama given the Nobel Peace Prize for his indecisiveness? He can’t decide what to do in Afghanistan. So while are young men are fighting and dying in Afghanistan, Barack Obama wants to do a five week study on the cause and effect of a troop serge. How many of our young men are losing their lives do to Barack Obama’s indecisiveness?
If we truly need 150,000 more troops in Afghanistan but through political maneuvering they got it down to 40,000 troops. One must ask; how many men will lose their lives because liberals are playing politics with the war in Afghanistan?
General Westmorland said that if you want to win a war you have to commit the necessary troops to the war. Win the war and then get out. Are we allowing the liberals in Washington, D.C., to make the same mistake they made during the Vietnam War?
If we need 150,000 more troops but only send the bare minimum of 40,000 troops to Afghanistan, then are we creating another Vietnam? How many men are losing their lives because of Barack Obama’s indecisiveness?
If Barack Obama was told by his general, in the field of battle that 40,000 more troops are needed, then through his indecisiveness we are losing men by his refusal to send the needed reinforcements. If this is true then how can we as Americans, look into the eyes of these families that have made the ultimate sacrifice of losing a son, when that life could have been saved by sending the needed reinforcements to Afghanistan.
Liberals during the Vietnam War played politics with troop numbers and finances, are we going to allow them to play the same type of politics with the war in Afghanistan? Are liberals hoping that by holding back reinforcements that the people of the United States will get tired of this war and start to call for the withdrawal of our troops, from Afghanistan?
I hope that the people of the United States understand if we withdrawal our troops from Afghanistan that the terrorist will regroup there and regain their strength. Then we will have more terrorist attacks in our country, the United States. We will be able to stop some of them but not all of them.
The reason we won’t be able to stop all of them is because we will be overwhelmed with terrorist attacks. We then can thank the Barack Obama’s administration for their naivety for allowing this to happen. Our leaders supposedly know more of what’s happening in this world then we do. So instead of playing politics with the war in Afghanistan, they should commit the reinforcements and save our young men’s lives.
It might be okay for them to play politics with our energy crisis, the global warming hoax and our economy but we should never allow them to play politics with the lives of our soldiers. Its one thing, to spread misery and despair to the people of the United States through the redistribution of wealth with a stimulus package, which was design to destroy our economy.
We the people of the United States should never, allow them, to spread dead and destruction through our military because of their naivety. The reinforcements that have been requested by the General in the field of battle, who should know the number of troops needed to fight the war in Afghanistan. Not some bureaucrat or politician putting numbers on a sheet of paper in Washington, D.C.
It’s interesting that if you are a Fascist these days, disguised as a liberal, you will be given the Nobel Peace Prize. I must not understand what this prize is given for. I thought it was given to someone who negotiates the stopping of a war or conflict, as Theodore Roosevelt did when Russia and Japan was engaged in bloody warfare.
So has the Nobel Peace Prize become a joke or has it become a political tool used by liberals, to try and give someone creditability, in the hopes that the world will fall into greater chaos. So with people like Al Gore a standing joke, Jimmy Carter a standing joke and now Barack Obama, I think that the Nobel Peace Prize organization has become a standing joke.
It seems that nowadays all you have to do is talk about peace and you will be given a Nobel Peace Prize, as long as you are a liberal. Has Barack Obama done anything to bring peace into the world? I haven’t seen it? Have you. There still is fighting going on, in Iraq and Afghanistan. What Barack Obama should have gotten was the Neville Chamberlin award for being so naive.
Barack Obama has now joined the ranks of Al Gore and Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002, another president that was naive. Jimmy Carter was naive when it came to the Russians, the Chinese and other world leaders. I see nothing has change when it comes to the naivety of liberalism. I don’t want to mention the naiveties of Al Gore it would take a book to cover all of them.
Was Barack Obama given the Nobel Peace Prize for his indecisiveness? He can’t decide what to do in Afghanistan. So while are young men are fighting and dying in Afghanistan, Barack Obama wants to do a five week study on the cause and effect of a troop serge. How many of our young men are losing their lives do to Barack Obama’s indecisiveness?
If we truly need 150,000 more troops in Afghanistan but through political maneuvering they got it down to 40,000 troops. One must ask; how many men will lose their lives because liberals are playing politics with the war in Afghanistan?
General Westmorland said that if you want to win a war you have to commit the necessary troops to the war. Win the war and then get out. Are we allowing the liberals in Washington, D.C., to make the same mistake they made during the Vietnam War?
If we need 150,000 more troops but only send the bare minimum of 40,000 troops to Afghanistan, then are we creating another Vietnam? How many men are losing their lives because of Barack Obama’s indecisiveness?
If Barack Obama was told by his general, in the field of battle that 40,000 more troops are needed, then through his indecisiveness we are losing men by his refusal to send the needed reinforcements. If this is true then how can we as Americans, look into the eyes of these families that have made the ultimate sacrifice of losing a son, when that life could have been saved by sending the needed reinforcements to Afghanistan.
Liberals during the Vietnam War played politics with troop numbers and finances, are we going to allow them to play the same type of politics with the war in Afghanistan? Are liberals hoping that by holding back reinforcements that the people of the United States will get tired of this war and start to call for the withdrawal of our troops, from Afghanistan?
I hope that the people of the United States understand if we withdrawal our troops from Afghanistan that the terrorist will regroup there and regain their strength. Then we will have more terrorist attacks in our country, the United States. We will be able to stop some of them but not all of them.
The reason we won’t be able to stop all of them is because we will be overwhelmed with terrorist attacks. We then can thank the Barack Obama’s administration for their naivety for allowing this to happen. Our leaders supposedly know more of what’s happening in this world then we do. So instead of playing politics with the war in Afghanistan, they should commit the reinforcements and save our young men’s lives.
It might be okay for them to play politics with our energy crisis, the global warming hoax and our economy but we should never allow them to play politics with the lives of our soldiers. Its one thing, to spread misery and despair to the people of the United States through the redistribution of wealth with a stimulus package, which was design to destroy our economy.
We the people of the United States should never, allow them, to spread dead and destruction through our military because of their naivety. The reinforcements that have been requested by the General in the field of battle, who should know the number of troops needed to fight the war in Afghanistan. Not some bureaucrat or politician putting numbers on a sheet of paper in Washington, D.C.