GentleGiant

A single smile costs one thousand pieces of gold

10.11.2009

I See That Barack Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize

I See That Barack Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize

It’s interesting that if you are a Fascist these days, disguised as a liberal, you will be given the Nobel Peace Prize. I must not understand what this prize is given for. I thought it was given to someone who negotiates the stopping of a war or conflict, as Theodore Roosevelt did when Russia and Japan was engaged in bloody warfare.

So has the Nobel Peace Prize become a joke or has it become a political tool used by liberals, to try and give someone creditability, in the hopes that the world will fall into greater chaos. So with people like Al Gore a standing joke, Jimmy Carter a standing joke and now Barack Obama, I think that the Nobel Peace Prize organization has become a standing joke.

It seems that nowadays all you have to do is talk about peace and you will be given a Nobel Peace Prize, as long as you are a liberal. Has Barack Obama done anything to bring peace into the world? I haven’t seen it? Have you. There still is fighting going on, in Iraq and Afghanistan. What Barack Obama should have gotten was the Neville Chamberlin award for being so naive.

Barack Obama has now joined the ranks of Al Gore and Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002, another president that was naive. Jimmy Carter was naive when it came to the Russians, the Chinese and other world leaders. I see nothing has change when it comes to the naivety of liberalism. I don’t want to mention the naiveties of Al Gore it would take a book to cover all of them.

Was Barack Obama given the Nobel Peace Prize for his indecisiveness? He can’t decide what to do in Afghanistan. So while are young men are fighting and dying in Afghanistan, Barack Obama wants to do a five week study on the cause and effect of a troop serge. How many of our young men are losing their lives do to Barack Obama’s indecisiveness?

If we truly need 150,000 more troops in Afghanistan but through political maneuvering they got it down to 40,000 troops. One must ask; how many men will lose their lives because liberals are playing politics with the war in Afghanistan?

General Westmorland said that if you want to win a war you have to commit the necessary troops to the war. Win the war and then get out. Are we allowing the liberals in Washington, D.C., to make the same mistake they made during the Vietnam War?

If we need 150,000 more troops but only send the bare minimum of 40,000 troops to Afghanistan, then are we creating another Vietnam? How many men are losing their lives because of Barack Obama’s indecisiveness?

If Barack Obama was told by his general, in the field of battle that 40,000 more troops are needed, then through his indecisiveness we are losing men by his refusal to send the needed reinforcements. If this is true then how can we as Americans, look into the eyes of these families that have made the ultimate sacrifice of losing a son, when that life could have been saved by sending the needed reinforcements to Afghanistan.

Liberals during the Vietnam War played politics with troop numbers and finances, are we going to allow them to play the same type of politics with the war in Afghanistan? Are liberals hoping that by holding back reinforcements that the people of the United States will get tired of this war and start to call for the withdrawal of our troops, from Afghanistan?

I hope that the people of the United States understand if we withdrawal our troops from Afghanistan that the terrorist will regroup there and regain their strength. Then we will have more terrorist attacks in our country, the United States. We will be able to stop some of them but not all of them.

The reason we won’t be able to stop all of them is because we will be overwhelmed with terrorist attacks. We then can thank the Barack Obama’s administration for their naivety for allowing this to happen. Our leaders supposedly know more of what’s happening in this world then we do. So instead of playing politics with the war in Afghanistan, they should commit the reinforcements and save our young men’s lives.

It might be okay for them to play politics with our energy crisis, the global warming hoax and our economy but we should never allow them to play politics with the lives of our soldiers. Its one thing, to spread misery and despair to the people of the United States through the redistribution of wealth with a stimulus package, which was design to destroy our economy.

We the people of the United States should never, allow them, to spread dead and destruction through our military because of their naivety. The reinforcements that have been requested by the General in the field of battle, who should know the number of troops needed to fight the war in Afghanistan. Not some bureaucrat or politician putting numbers on a sheet of paper in Washington, D.C.

10.05.2009

The Blame Game Democrats Play

The Blame Game Democrats Play

I find it interesting that every time a Democrat fails at something a Republican gets blamed for that failure. Just recently Barack Obama failed to bring the Olympics to Chicago in 2016 and who got the blame for that failure, George Bush that’s who.

Now I’m not into the blame game. I just state the facts of what happened whether it is the Republicans or Democrats fault, for what happened. I don’t want to live in the type of country that Germany was, in the 1930s, where everything that went wrong, was blamed on the Jews.

I believe that if you failed or made a mistake just come out with it and then move on with making the corrections. Hopefully you learn from that mistake and hopefully you won’t make it again but when you try to blame someone else for your mistakes or failures, then you're refusing to admit that you are a human being. I wonder if this is why Barack Obama has a messiah complex and feels he is an elite to the elitist.

So people who refuse to admit that they failed or made a mistake must fall into the category of elitist. How can you spot an elitist? It’s very easy, all you have to do is observer their attitude, if they feel that they are the smartest man/woman in the room, then they are probably an elitist. If they have a condescending attitude toward you, then they are probably an elitist. If they feel that only they have a right to freedom of speech, then they are probably an elitist. If they are so arrogant and feel that no one can teach them anything, then they are probably an elitist.

So who are some of these elitists in our country, the United States? I would say that Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, the late Ted Kennedy, Joe Biden, Jimmy Carter and almost every Democrat you would run into, would fall into this category.

So why do the people of the United States keep voting in these type of people? I really don’t know. Anyone who has ever worked with someone who felt that he/she was the smartest person in the room knows what I’m talking about. These people, who feel that way, usually are not the smartest person in the room. They are usually the one who screws up everything but takes the credit for a job well done after you fix his/her screw ups.

Now it is interesting to see how the lackeys at the state run news media protect their task masters, the members of the Democrat Party. Let’s look at an example of what these lackeys did during the George Bush Presidency. How many of you remember when unemployment was at 4.5% in 2006 and where the state run news media was calling it the worst economy since that Great Depression.

The Democrats won a majority of seats in the House of Representatives and the Senate in the 2006 elections. Unemployment shot up to 8.1% and George Bush got the blame, which gave Barack Obama the election in 2008. Now unemployment is at 17%, if you take into account the people that are still looking for work but are not drawing any unemployment. You are not considered unemployed if you are not drawing unemployment.

Joe Biden says that the stimulus plan that the Democrats and Barack Obama put forth is working beyond his wildest dreams. Really, I believe that if they would have left the economy alone, we probably would have had an unemployment rate of about 8.1%, half of what we have under their plan.

What’s interesting to me is another elitist is speaking out, who is trying to protect Barack Obama by calling us racist for questioning Barack Obama’s policies. I can remember when Hilary Clinton said that anyone, who questions an administration's plan, had the right to do so and was a patriot for doing so. Man, how things change when Democrats get in power. Well I’m not a racist and I do want a job. I need to provide for my wife and myself.

So the question that keeps coming up into my mind is how could anyone with half the mentality of a half wit, say that Barack Obama’s plan to simulate the economy is working. When someone says that the Democrat's plan, to simulate the economy is working beyond his wildest dreams you have to wonder, what kind of mentality he has. The evidence shows differently.

Unless that was the plan all along, why would the Democrat Party want to have so many people out of work after all, they must know this is policies suicide. They must believe that they can turn the economy around after they get what they want. They will have a year to do so before the election of 2010. Since we have such short memorials, they probably will get away with it.

So what is on the Democrat Party’s agenda? Let’s see they have cap and tread, health insurance, tax increases for everybody and gay marriage. I think they want us out of work, so they can get a government run health care plan, pushed through congress. An economy that matches the economy of the Great Depress would help them in their efforts to do so.

So how would this help them, usually people that are out of work can't afford to pay for health insurance. This will worry the people that have children who go to school because most children will participate in after school activities such as football, baseball and basketball. These all have the potential for injuries.

Democrats are hoping for an emotional respond from parents, not a rationally thinking respond. They are hoping that the people will forget about how our big blotted, slow moving, inefficient government will make things worst instead of better. I hope we don’t fall for this ploy.